How did Citizens United change campaign finance laws? Select three …

Social Studies Questions
Short Answer
Step by Step Solution
Social Studies Questions

How did Citizens United change campaign finance laws? Select three correct answers. A. It increased the amount that individual donors can contribute to a campaign. B. It removed the monetary limits that corporations and individuals can spend to independently influence an election. C. It prohibited voters from learning who donated to a campaign. D. It increased the amount of money spent on elections. E. It resulted in a small number of wealthy individuals having undue influence in elections.

Short Answer

The Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission case in 2010 significantly changed campaign financing by allowing unlimited donations from corporations and organizations and facilitating the creation of Super PACs. This ruling raised concerns about political transparency, as it enabled anonymous donations and increased risks of corruption in electoral processes.

Step-by-Step Solution

Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission fundamentally altered campaign financing in three significant steps.

1. Understanding the Background

The Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission case, decided in 2010, addressed the issue of campaign financing. Prior to this landmark ruling, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) imposed strict limits on how much individuals, political parties, and Political Action Committees (PACs) could donate to political campaigns. These regulations aimed to curb the influence of money in politics.

2. Key Outcomes of the Ruling

The ruling effectively reversed previous restrictions, allowing various entities to engage in significantly greater spending on electoral campaigns. Key outcomes include:

  • Unlimited Donations: Corporations and organizations can now contribute unlimited amounts to political campaigns.
  • Creation of Super PACs: These committees can raise and spend unlimited funds, enabling large financial backing for candidates.

3. Implications for Political Transparency

The Citizens United ruling introduced serious implications for transparency and accountability in campaign financing. The main issues are:

  • Anonymous Donors: Donors can remain anonymous, leading to concerns about undisclosed influences on election outcomes.
  • Increased Corruption Risks: With reduced transparency, the potential for corrupt practices in politics becomes more prevalent.

Related Concepts

Citizens United

A landmark supreme court case that ruled in 2010, allowing corporations and organizations to spend unlimited amounts on political campaigns.

Federal Election Commission (Fec)

The agency responsible for enforcing federal campaign finance laws, which previously imposed strict limits on contributions to political campaigns.

Super Pacs

Political action committees that can raise and spend unlimited funds to support candidates, formed as a consequence of the citizens united ruling.

Table Of Contents
  1. How did Citizens United change campaign finance laws? Select three correct answers. A. It increased the amount that individual donors can contribute to a campaign. B. It removed the monetary limits that corporations and individuals can spend to independently influence an election. C. It prohibited voters from learning who donated to a campaign. D. It increased the amount of money spent on elections. E. It resulted in a small number of wealthy individuals having undue influence in elections.

Related Articles

Scroll to Top