Short Answer
Tan argues that language doesn’t need to adhere to standard rules to be meaningful, challenging the idea of “proper” language and emphasizing the value of nonstandard communication. She reflects on her guilt for labeling her mother’s English as “broken,” recognizing that effective communication is not defined by grammatical precision but by the ability to convey ideas and emotions.
Understanding Tan’s Argument about Language
Tan explores the significance of her mother’s use of English to illustrate that language does not have to conform to standard rules to convey meaning. This argument challenges the notion of what defines “proper” language and emphasizes the value in nonstandard forms of communication.
Context of Guilt and Recognition
Tan expresses a sense of guilt for referring to her mother’s English as “broken” or “fractured.” This feeling signifies her acknowledgment of the emotional weight that accompanies language and the importance of recognizing that her mother’s nonstandard English effectively communicates ideas and emotions.
Central Idea of Purposeful Communication
Through this narrative, Tan constructs the central idea that effective communication does not rely solely on grammatical precision. She highlights that language is about conveying meaning and purpose, which can be achieved in various forms, demonstrating that understanding and connection can thrive in imperfect speech.