Short Answer 
The debate emphasizes the importance of health education and prevention to improve societal health outcomes, advocating for a collective responsibility towards health care as a societal right. Additionally, it calls for reforming medical ethics to prioritize public health over for-profit motives, aiming for a more equitable and healthy future through preventive strategies.
Step 1: Emphasize Health Education and Prevention
The core of the debate suggests that prioritizing health education and preventive measures can lead to better health outcomes for society. This shift focuses on educating the public about health practices, habits, and lifestyle choices, which can significantly reduce the need for medical intervention. By promoting preventive health care, fewer resources would be needed for treating illnesses, ultimately fostering a healthier population.
Step 2: Societal Perspective on Health Care
Viewing health care as a societal right is crucial in this debate. This perspective aligns health care with public services like education and policing, emphasizing the role of the community in maintaining health standards. Advocates argue that this collective responsibility can lead to a more equitable system where everyone has access to essential health resources and services, similar to how education is perceived in society.
Step 3: Reforming Medical Practices and Ethics
There is a pressing need to evaluate the ethics surrounding for-profit medical practices. The debate calls for stricter regulations to protect public health over private interests, ensuring that medical experiments and practices prioritize well-being. Creating a new wellness model that integrates ethical considerations and preventive strategies can transform how health is approached and managed, promoting a healthier future for everyone.