In a well-structured paragraph, evaluate the effectiveness of the argument …

English Questions
Short Answer
Step by Step Solution
English Questions

In a well-structured paragraph, evaluate the argument in the previous passage. State whether the argument is effective or not, and determine the effectiveness of the reasoning, evidence, and diction. Answer below !Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.

Short Answer

Machiavelli argues that effective leadership requires a balance between cruelty and temperance to maintain order and prevent rebellion. He uses deductive reasoning and historical examples to support his claim, emphasizing the necessity of instilling some level of fear to ensure obedience among followers. His sophisticated tone enhances the persuasive impact of his arguments.

Step-by-Step Solution

Step 1: Understanding Leadership Balance

Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of a leader maintaining a balance between temperate and cruel attitudes. A well-rounded leader recognizes that being overly lenient may lead to rebellion and chaos among their subjects. This balance is crucial for sustaining order and ensuring that laws are respected and followed.

Step 2: The Role of Deductive Reasoning

To support his argument, Machiavelli employs deductive reasoning. He begins with a clear conclusion that a leader must be somewhat cruel to ensure obedience. He illustrates this by stating that without some level of fear instilled in their followers, a leader risks losing control and inviting insubordination.

Step 3: Historical Evidence and Tone

Machiavelli strengthens his claims with compelling historical examples that reflect the consequences of leadership styles. His choice of sophisticated diction also adds a serious tone, which enhances his authority on the subject. Together, these elements make his argument effective and resonate with the audience, even if it can be unsettling.

Related Concepts

Leadership Balance

The ability of a leader to maintain a proper equilibrium between leniency and cruelty to prevent rebellion and chaos

Deductive Reasoning

A logical process where conclusions are drawn from general principles or premises to support an argument

Historical Evidence

Real-life instances or examples from the past used to substantiate claims and enhance the credibility of an argument.

Table Of Contents
  1. In a well-structured paragraph, evaluate the argument in the previous passage. State whether the argument is effective or not, and determine the effectiveness of the reasoning, evidence, and diction. Answer below !Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.

Related Articles

Scroll to Top