Short Answer 
The spoils system under Andrew Jackson promoted political participation but was marred by corruption and a preference for loyalty over merit, undermining democratic values. It resulted in appointments based on party affiliation rather than qualifications, challenging ideals of fairness and equal opportunity in government.
Step 1: Understand the Dual Nature of the Spoils System
The spoils system under Andrew Jackson had both strong democratic and undemocratic characteristics. It aimed to increase political participation by linking government job security to the success of the ruling party. This connection motivated individuals to engage with politics in hopes of obtaining government positions.
Step 2: Recognize the Corruption and Lack of Merit
Despite promoting participation, the spoils system often led to significant corruption and a preference for loyalty over qualifications. Such practices included:
- Appointments based on party loyalty rather than competency.
- Scandals involving officials, such as a Jackson appointee stealing over $1 million.
- A disregard for education and experience in government roles.
Step 3: Assess the Impact on Democratic Values
The consequences of the spoils system highlighted a contradiction to democratic ideals. Jackson utilized this system to strengthen his power and reward loyal supporters, undermining principles such as:
- Fairness in government appointments.
- Equal opportunity for all qualified candidates.
- Responsible governance devoid of favoritism.